Home > CAST, Testing > Best. Conference. Ever.

Best. Conference. Ever.

July 24th, 2008

Author’s note: This post is wildly overdue.

I’ve been meaning to write this post for a while. I was thinking about how I’d write it — how creative I could be while introducing it — to the point where I never actually got to writing it. And you know what, ladies and gentleman? That’s simply atrocious, considering how absolutely awesome CAST 2008 was.

I enjoyed this CAST more than the other two previous CASTs. Though CAST 2007 sported a fun and enlightening certification debate, and CAST 2006 paved ground with an interesting but heated discussion after the first keynote, this CAST seemed different.

The biggest difference, I think, was that I wasn’t a student.

Rob Sabourin likes to talk about people going out in the world and being “blooded” after many years experience. I am by no means a blooded professional — I’m still getting dirt under my nails — but in the last year, I’ve gained a new appreciation for the “people” aspect of our industry. Whereas in college I focused on code, exams, homework and text books (to the greatest degree of perfection I had time for), in the real world I can focus on people.

At this CAST, I made an effort to talk to as many people as I could. Not only would I talk to them, but I did my best to find something interesting about what they had to say. Though I could have simply shied away or given into nervousness or not even cared, I met so many interesting people that I’d argue meeting people was the single best part of CAST.

Though the “people” aspect was likely the part of CAST I enjoyed the most, it definitely wasn’t everything. Here’s a few bullets that highlight my CAST experience:

  • Getting on a plane with absolutely no sleep, making it to Toronto in good spirits and then exploring the city.
  • Meeting people that I met at previous CASTs (shout out to Henrik, who was the first recognizable face I saw).
  • Going to Jerry Weinberg’s tutorial, and meeting him for the first time.
  • Being told I look Irish.
  • Being told I look like Wolverine.
  • Being given a staff badge by Paul Holland, making me feel as if I was part of the group (though I’m sure he just wanted to make me available to help :) ).
  • Seeing Cem and Becky again.
  • Going to a small Irish pub to see Michael Bolton & Nick Wolf play traditional Irish music.
  • Getting tested by Ben Simo through his use of children’s toys.
  • Seeing RobSab and his wife Anne’s presentation. (Absolutely beautiful, and even more beautiful that they can do it together.)
  • Having a new analogy for manual test scripts that deals with diseased rats.
  • Meeting the Dorset House Publishing people, who literally work right across the deck from The Open Planning Project in New York City.
  • Being gently pushed to give a lightning talk. (Dawn, thank you for that.)
  • Noticing as people took notes when I gave my lightning talk.
  • Getting handshakes afterward when people told me it was a good lightning talk.
  • Getting told that I could have a quarterly Tim-bits column in The AST Update (or another soon-to-be named AST magazine).
  • Getting told by Scott Barber and others that I should publish a book of Tim-bits a few years down the road.
  • Being told I look Irish, again.
  • Being told I look like Wolverine — again.
  • Going out to a pub with Michael Bolton and many others, and teaming up with Louise Perold for his bouncy-ball testing game.
  • And finally, Hanging out with Carsten, Louise, Henrik, Ben and Chris during most of my CAST off-time.

And there’s more items I can list. Much more.

Overall, this CAST was a great experience, and I want to thank everyone who shared in that experience with me. Thank you, all.

CAST, Testing

  1. Henrik Andersson
    July 24th, 2008 at 15:03 | #1

    Tim It was great fun to meet you again.
    I agree that this was an amazing CAST.
    I recommend everyone to attend CAST 2009, it is really special.
    Cheers
    Henrik (or Hendrik if you wish :))

    [From Tim: Wow, wasn't that a glaring typo. It's fixed now.]

  2. Becky
    July 24th, 2008 at 19:23 | #2

    FWIW . . . I heard one guy refer to you as “the TimBits guy” when you weren’t around. As it turns out, the listener knew exactly who you were based on that description. :-)

  3. Louise
    July 28th, 2008 at 07:14 | #3

    I also have to agree with you .. and Henrik :) … it was an awesome CAST. Forming these relationships means a lot to me - even though I am far away, I know that there are a lot of really smart people I can get in touch with and use as a sounding board and get advice from or just chat about testing with - without (as Ben Kelly said) “Their eyes glazing over”.. Glad you are one of these people Tim.
    Looking forward to your TimBits…

  4. July 30th, 2008 at 04:28 | #4

    G’day Tim,
    Just putting in my $0.02 re the conference even though it’s pretty much ditto yourself, Henrik and Lou. It was great to catch up with you all. It takes a certain kind of weirdo to be a good tester and you guys are my kind of weird.

    re your typo, I may have to refer to Henrik as ‘Jimmy’ from now on. :)
    Will see if I can make it to CAST 2009. Hope to see you there.

  5. Simon
    August 7th, 2008 at 11:36 | #5

    Having a new analogy for manual test scripts that deals with diseased rats.

    Explain :-)
    [From Tim: Cem gave a presentation relating his psychology experience with that of software testing. In the presentation, he talked of an experiment where he put both healthy and diseased rats into an electrified box, and observed how each made it out of the box. The healthy rats quickly found the opening leading to safety, and when placed in the box a second time, anticipated the electric shock. The diseased rats, however, seemed to follow a script of "Turn right, turn right, turn right, find opening." When Cem altered the experiment, say, by placing the rats in a different part of the box -- this time close to the door -- the healthy rats found the opening right away, whereas the diseased rats followed their script and either had trouble or didn't find the opening at all.

    The message in his presentation, I think, is that if we employ mindless script-running drones who we don't expect to think at all, then we're going to get results similar to the diseased rats. However, if we empower our testers to use their heads, and expect them to account for changes -- because software is always changing -- then we'll get much better, healthier, results.]

  6. Simon
    August 8th, 2008 at 11:37 | #6

    Thanks Tim, It’s time to get rid of diseased rats!

  7. Becky
    September 3rd, 2008 at 06:10 | #7

    Actually, when Cem tells the story, it’s brain-damaged rats - not diseased rats.

  1. September 1st, 2008 at 08:17 | #1